It all started in the SIXTIES, Beatles even end 50ties, 1957 to be precisely, when a guy named Lennon started the quarrymen. From one thing came another, first Paul (GUITAR!!) and his buddy George Harisson. They had TOMMY MOORE & later PETE BEST as drummer and finally they kept RINGO, because he was more advanced. Other members: STU SUTCLIFF Bass guitar and JOHN, PAUL, GEORGE on guitar. Finally they thanked Pete Best for his services (didn't fit in the "managers" profile. Lot of law suits, but when the serie ANTHOLOGY came on the market, BEST received quit a lot of "legal" money, because in a few songs HE played, and 30 years later he got his share. Some people say that he was more popular, followed by frictions, and he couldn't drum because of not being able to keep time.
ROLLING STONES: more or less very similar in the beginning, they both played the rock and roll, discovered in England by sailors, bringing a lot of albums from the USA. At that time BLUES & ROCK and ROLL, where played by a minority, Afro Americans and a lot of US citizens didn't even know what that music was: dark, diabolic, not done. The original line up: Brian Jones (band leader, Mic on the mic, "Kieff" Ricahards, Bill Wyman, and Charlie Watts. They had another member: Ian Stuart, kicked out of the group because "too ugly", but playing every concert and in studio, until he died.
WHO IS BETTER?
The Beatles changed the music, for ever, AND knowing that the Stones started in 1962, they had already more fame. As I wrote, they both started with R&R, like "Twist and Shout" and John always claiming that he was "petrified" when he listened to Elvis, oops, he did it again. But they started almost immediatly writing own songs, like "Please, Please me", "Love me Do", in 1962, the year the Stones started, and wearing a stamp on their faces, that they were like a rebel. Who remembers the nice suits the Beatles were wearing in the beginning.
But about who is the best? It was like a competion: FOR or AGAINST, and you have to admit, that even the Stones writing beautiful ballads like "ruby tuesday", "lady Jane"their music staid real close for years, even decades, to blues and R&R, while the Beatles starting with 3 chjords songs evolved to a group composing in fact more and more complicated songs. I have a book: "the evolution of the sound of the Beatles". What they did 40 years ago, recording an entire album in 1 week, now groups record in 1 year, was incredible.
In fact, the question Beatles versus Stones, who is the best? is a retorical question. I was once a die hard fan: "deep purple", "pink floyd", "led zeppelin", but in fact ONLY ONE THING MATTERS: DO YOU LIKE THE SONGS?
But if you want to see who wrote what, in the Beatles, I give you the following link:
http: // en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Beatles. (Google: the Beatles: wikipedia, and one of the last lines is the DISCOGRAPHY like list of Beatles songs by singer.
Also check out the songs the Beatles gave away.
______________________________________________________________________________
GITAARDOCPHIL SAIS: BEAT THE STONES (with a long answer)
In fact they started both playing R&R, but the Beatles were absolutely the number one in writing their own stuff. The Stones started later, playing own songs. (they had another member